CENP-A

Optimal result: 0 – 11 SI

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is systemic, autoimmune, connective tissue disorder characterized by vascular abnormalities, collagen deposition (fibrosis), and the production of autoantibodies to nuclear proteins. About 20%–40% of patients have antibodies to centromere protein (CENP)-A or -B.

CENP-A stands for centromere proteins A.

Centromere antibodies can be directed against a number of centromere proteins (CENP), including CENP-A, -B, and -C, though CENP-B is thought to be the main target.

These antibodies are found in 20% to 40% of patients with SSc and are associated with the lcSSc subtype.

Furthermore, centromere antibodies are included in the 2013 ACR-EULAR classification criteria. However, these antibodies can occur in other connective tissue diseases, including:

- systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),

- primary biliary cholangitis,

- rheumatoid arthritis,

- and Sjögren syndrome.

CENP-A stands for centromere proteins A.

Centromere antibodies can be directed against a number of centromere proteins (CENP), including CENP-A, -B, and -C, though CENP-B is thought to be the main target.

These antibodies are found in 20% to 40% of patients with SSc and are associated with the lcSSc subtype.

Furthermore, centromere antibodies are included in the 2013 ACR-EULAR classification criteria. However, these antibodies can occur in other connective tissue diseases, including:

- systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),

- primary biliary cholangitis,

- rheumatoid arthritis,

- and Sjögren syndrome.

Presence of centromere antibodies is considered predictive of SSc development in patients with Raynaud phenomenon (a problem that causes decreased blood flow to the fingers. In some cases, it also causes less blood flow to the ears, toes, nipples, knees, or nose. This happens due to spasms of blood vessels in those areas. The spasms happen in response to cold, stress, or emotional upset.)

The antibodies are associated with lower risk of cardiac and renal involvement but higher risk of PAH (= pulmonary arterial hypertension). For patients without PAH, centromere antibodies are associated with a better prognosis overall than are other autoantibodies.

Systemic Sclerosis Classification Criteria:

Classify as having systemic sclerosis if the sum of points for criteria below is ≥9.

Criterion

Points

Skin thickened on fingers of both hands, extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints

9

Skin on fingers thickened (only count highest score)

   Puffy fingers

   Sclerodactylya

 

2

4

Lesions on fingertips (only count highest score)

   Ulcers on tip of digits

   Pitting scars on fingertips

 

2

3

Telangiectasia

2

Abnormal nailfold capillaries

2

Pulmonary arterial hypertension and/or interstitial lung disease (max score is 2)

   Pulmonary arterial hypertension

   Interstitial lung disease

 

2

2

Raynaud phenomenon

3

Presence of 1 or more of the following:

   Centromere antibody

   Scl-70 antibody

   RNA polymerase III antibody

3

Clinical Characteristics Associated With Autoantibodies Used in the Diagnosis and Classification of Systemic Sclerosisa:

Antibody

Prevalence in SSc, %

Presence in other autoimmune diseases

SSc type most likely

Clinical associations

Relative SSc prognosis

ANA

85-95

Common

Does not help differentiate type

Most common in rheumatic diseases

Varies

Centromere A or B

20-40 b

Uncommon

lcSSc

PAH, calcinosis, digital ischemia, intestinal involvement

Better

Ku

1.5-5

Common

Overlap syndromes or lcSSc

Muscle and joint involvement

Unclear

PM/Scl-75 or PM/Scl-100

2-11

Common

SSc-myositis overlap syndrome or lcSSc

Muscle and joint involvement, calcinosis; GI and lung involvement for those with PM/Scl-75

Better

RNA Polymerase III

7-41

Rare

dcSSc

Renal crisis, progressive skin thickening, GAVE, malignancy

Poorer

Scl-70

9.4-71 b

Rare

dcSSc

Severe pulmonary fibrosis, cardiac involvement, renal crisis, digital ulcers

Poorer

Th/To

2-5

Rare

lcSSc

Pulmonary involvement

Poorer

U1-snRNP

2-14

Common (90% in patients with MCTD)

lcSSc

PAH, arthritis, esophageal dysfunction

Better

U3-RNP (Fibrillarin)

4-10 b

Rare

dcSSc

Multiorgan involvement, PAH

Poorer

ANA, antinuclear antibodies; dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; GAVE, gastric antral vascular ectasia; GI, gastrointestinal; lcSSc, limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; SSc, systemic sclerosis.
a Data presented in this table have been compiled from the cited references. It is important to note that autoantibody frequency in SSc as well as other autoimmune diseases varies with sex, ethnicity, and population studied.
b In the United States, prevalence has been shown to vary across ethnicities.

References:

van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(11):2737-2747. doi:10.1002/art.38098

Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, et al. Antinuclear antibodies in systemic sclerosis: an update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020;58(1):40-51. doi:10.1007/s12016-018-8718-8

Kayser C, Fritzler MJ. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis: unanswered questions. Front Immunol. 2015;6:167. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00167

Hamaguchi Y, Takehara K. Anti-nuclear autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis: news and perspectives. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018;3(3):201-213. doi:10.1177/2397198318783930

Mahler M, Meroni PL, Bossuyt X, et al. Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:315179. doi:10.1155/2014/315179

Cavazzana I, Fredi M, Taraborelli M, et al. A subset of systemic sclerosis but not of systemic lupus erythematosus is defined by isolated anti-Ku autoantibodies. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(2 suppl 76):118-121.

D'Aoust J, Hudson M, Tatibouet S, et al. Clinical and serologic correlates of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in systemic sclerosis: a multicenter study of 763 patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(6):1608-1615. doi:10.1002/art.38428

Wodkowski M, Hudson M, Proudman S, et al. Clinical correlates of monospecific anti-PM75 and anti-PM100 antibodies in a tri-nation cohort of 1574 systemic sclerosis subjects. Autoimmunity. 2015;48(8):542-551. doi:10.3109/08916934.2015.1077231

Shah AA, Hummers LK, Casciola-Rosen L, et al. Examination of autoantibody status and clinical features associated with cancer risk and cancer-associated scleroderma. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(4):1053-1061. doi:10.1002/art.39022

Sobanski V, Dauchet L, Lefèvre G, et al. Prevalence of anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies in systemic sclerosis: new data from a French cohort and a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):407-417. doi:10.1002/art.38219

Pokeerbux MR, Giovannelli J, Dauchet L, et al. Survival and prognosis factors in systemic sclerosis: data of a French multicenter cohort, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):86. doi:10.1186/s13075-019-1867-1

Mehra S, Walker J, Patterson K, et al. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12(3):340-354. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.05.011

Krzyszczak ME, Li Y, Ross SJ, et al. Gender and ethnicity differences in the prevalence of scleroderma-related autoantibodies. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(10):1333-1339. doi:10.1007/s10067-011-1751-0

Nandiwada SL, Peterson LK, Mayes MD, et al. Ethnic differences in autoantibody diversity and hierarchy: more clues from a US cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(10):1816-1824. doi:10.3899/jrheum.160106

Federico Perosa, Marcella Prete, Giuseppe Di Lernia, Carmela Ostuni, Elvira Favoino, Gabriele Valentini, Anti-centromere protein A antibodies in systemic sclerosis: Significance and origin, Autoimmunity Reviews, Volume 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 102-109, ISSN 1568-9972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2015.10.001.

CENP-A
Healthmatters dashboard showing biomarker trend graph

Every lab result you’ve ever had, charted and explained.

Healthmatters is a tracker for your lab results. Upload a report from any lab, any country — every marker charted and explained.

Start with my report →
Beyond CENP-A — 10,000+ markers explained
One CENP-A result tells you where you are. Your history tells you where you’re heading. Upload your past lab reports and see this marker — and every marker on them —every marker charted against your own lab’s ranges.
Start with this report →
Healthmatters timeline preview showing biomarker trends over time
Clinical Sources & References

All our content is backed by peer-reviewed studies, academic research, and trusted medical sources. We’re committed to accuracy and transparency — see our editorial policy for details.

Article Review Log
Written by Healthmatters Editorial Team
Healthmatters Lifetime Plan

Pay $250. Track your health forever

One payment. No renewals. Yours for life.

10,000+ biomarkers explained · trends over time

See other plans →
Secure checkout via Stripe · GDPR & HIPAA
We accept results from any lab
LabCorp Quest Diagnostics Genova Diagnostics DUTCH Test Doctor's Data Vibrant America ZRT Laboratory Cyrex Labs + any other lab

What members are saying

★★★★★ 10,000+ happy members
★★★★★

"Watching my numbers move over the years — instead of forgetting last time's results — completely changed how I manage my health."

Daniel
Member since 2022
★★★★★

"Living across several countries made keeping my lab results organized a real challenge. Healthmatters brought my results from the USA, Spain, and Germany together — 20 years of history, with long-term trends instead of scattered reports."

Ben
Member since 2021 · tracks across countries
★★★★★

"Standard lab ranges are too wide for how I practice — 'normal' isn't optimal. I set my own bands, so a client sees yellow before a marker goes officially out of range. That's the conversation I want to be having."

Dr. Alexandra
Functional medicine · 6 yrs on Pro